The reader will soon see why this post is called chapter One.
Try it:
If you Google “The Average Law” you will find:
Law of averages – Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_averages
The law of averages (which is not considered a valid mathematical rule or principle) is the belief that a particular outcome or event is inevitable or certain simply …
If you Google “The Law of Averages” you will find:
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/law%20of%20averages
Definition of law of averages
- : the commonsense observation that probability influences everyday life so that over the long term the possible outcomes of a repeated event occur with specific frequencies.”
That is about all that is worth anything on Google on the matters of the Average Law or the Law of Average whichever you may choose to call it. Do Google now and see what you come up with.
It was my good fortune to meet an old guy of my age in recent years with an interest in the Philosophy of History; we soon discovered points of agreement and other points of mutual interest in observation and interpretation of current and past events. A bond developed out of that and the points on which we differed; that in turn lead to discussions on where we are in the World today and where we are going; where the World is going.
When we got to the basics we found that we were talking about what we have since decided to call “The Natural Laws of Average and Majorities” and that is what will form a book on the most astounding revelations of all the known sciences, peoples, countries, attitudes and humanity as compared with Nature.
He had spent a lifetime in research much like mine but he retained his faith in the survival of the species when he returned to rural life whereas I have more or less given up and recently decided to get “back to the City” as described in my two recent Posts One and Two right here.
We discussed that the other day and in some way or another [we had been talking of Natural Majorities] he said to me:
“You know what?”
I said “no, please tell me.’
“If you want any clear idea simple, straight and most common proof of the value of current day communication it is in the fact that the vast majority of the public, or of humanity, that can read want to write and see their names in print. That is why they are all on the Internet,” he said.
“And those that cannot read or write?” I asked.
“They don’t count,” he replied.
I was amazed.
“Which of the two groups is in the majority?” I asked.
To my amazement he replied: “Nobody knows the answer to that.”
Read Chapter Two when you see it. We hope to publish it real soon.
Ike Jakson
In Americus GA saka Americoon
Tags: History, Internet, Journalism, Nature, research, WordPress
Jaksonian Philosophy 
June 7, 2017 at 3:58 pm |
Thanks for the Likes, Fellows